Common misconception dictates that
although texts can appear as an original concept, they are often the
most derivative, with no innovation from aspects of other pioneering
media. Using the work of others is a conceptual tool. It's a way of
thinking, a way of operating. It's a process of artistic expression
with 'increased levels of audience participation, creative
involvement and democracy.'(Creeber, 2009, p.20) For example,
internet Memes have become a subversion from the original text;
re-contextualised from images adopted by internet sub-cultures,
and re-appropriated according to context. But how has 'the
hypertextual ‘cut’ and ‘paste’ culture of New Media – that
seemingly encourages sampling' (Creeber, 2009, p.19) changed
how theorists conceive Analogue and New Media? Producing 'copy- right
problems, it also further confuses the very means by which we
conceive of the media and its relationship with its
audience.' (Creeber, 2009, p.19)
Creeber proposes individuals are
'manipulated'; 'shaped by sociological, psychological and
linguistic structures over which they have little control.' (Creeber,
2009, p.14) This is due to the 'encoding' of semiotics within
our culture, and the 'coherent methodology... of any text [becoming]
read objectively' (Creeber, 2009, p.14) However, the
encoded semiotic meaning adapts, coercing to the ways in which it is 'decoded' (by its receivers). (Hall, 1973, p.53) 'Rather than being a
passive... consumption... is seen increasingly as an activity with
its own practices.' (Creeber, 2009, p.19)
Digital culture gives rise to new practice; 'the content being constantly developed through self
expression, conveying emotions.' (Anon, 2011, 2:15) Memes are a product of both post
modernism and digital culture; 'technology... increased levels of
audience participation, creative involvement and
democracy.' (Creeber, 2009, p.20) Algorithms of sites such
as Youtube allow you to argue against fair use law for the use of
copyrighted media if presenting a point. Appropriation is
appreciation, however the locking down of finances from distributing
companies often results in the the removal of content online.
'Websites like YouTube, MySpace and Facebook appear to reflect this
recent understanding of ‘participatory culture.’(Jenkins, 2008, p.3)' (Creeber,
2009, p.19) Birth of the reader has emerged from 'writing
movements'. (Manovich, 2001, p.47) Meaning isn't locked
into text, but interpreted though audiences, as remix develops into a
political process.
Bibliography:
Anon, (2011), 'Visual Culture Online
| Off Book | PBS Arts', Available
at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL7R9CjkxjY
Creeber, G. (2009), 'Digital Theory:
Theorizing New Media & Cubitt, D.' (2009) 'Case Study: Digital
Aesthetics in Ed. Creeber, G. & Royston, M'. (2009) 'Digital
Cultures: Understanding New Media; Maidenstone', Open University Press
Manovich, L. (2001), 'The Language of
New Media', Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jenkins, H. (2006), 'Convergence Culture:
Where Old and New Media Collide', New York University Press
Hall, Stuart ([1973] 1980):
'Encoding/decoding'. In Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies
(Ed.): Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies,
1972-79 London: Hutchinson
No comments:
Post a Comment
This is a class blog for students enrolled on the History and Analysis of New Media Module at The University of Ulster. Please keep comments constructive to help students progress with the given text